SOFTWARE
   AUSTAL View
   CALPUFF View
   CALRoads View
   CAM View
   EcoRisk View
   Emissions View
   IRAP-h View
   ISC-AERMOD View
   MOBILE View
   RMP View
   Screen View
   SEVEX View
   SLAB 3D
   SLAB View
PURCHASE
   How to Order
   Distributors
DOWNLOADS
   WRPLOT View
   Percent View
   RMP Wizard
   US EPA Models
   Lakes Demos
TRAINING
   Upcoming Courses
   Modeling Tips
RESOURCES
   Air Toxics Index
   Digital Terrain Data
   Mercury
   Meteorological Data
   Regulatory Links
   Hot Links
LAKES INFO
   Project Experience
   News Archive
   About Lakes
   Job Opportunities
   Contact Us

 

Estimation of Dispersion Coefficients

The standard deviations for both the lateral and vertical concentration distributions (y and z respectively) result from the combined effects of: ambient turbulence a ); turbulence induced by plume buoyancy (b); and, enhancements from building wake effects (d).  

Dispersion (ya,za ), induced by ambient turbulence, is known to vary significantly with height, having its strongest variation near the earth’s surface. Unlike present regulatory models, AERMOD has been designed to account for this height variation.

In our earlier AERMOD formulations for ys & za we attempted to account for vertical variations in turbulence through treatment of vertical in homogeneity. However, comparisons made using the Prairie Grass data showed this approach to be inadequate. Therefore, the current expression for za is a combination of a direct treatment of surface dispersion and the more traditional approach based on Taylor (1921) for elevated dispersion. With this, we obtained good results for all SBL comparisons. However, the results in the CBL indicated that our treatment of lateral dispersion near the surface was problematic. We corrected this with an empirical relationship for ya near the surface using the full (CBL and SBL) Prairie Grass data set. In the remainder of this section we will describe those formulations for ya & za that resulted from this empirical analysis.

In the CBL, although the ambient induced dispersion for the Direct (D) and Indirect (I) sources is treated differently than for the Penetrated (P) source, the general approach of combining the effects from ambient turbulence, buoyancy and buildings, is the same. For the Direct and Indirect sources, the total dispersion coefficients (y or z ) are calculated from the following general y z expression (Pasquill and Smith, 1983): 

For the penetrated source, the total dispersion is calculated as follows:

 

and building wakes are assumed to have little influence.

For the injected source, the total dispersion is calculated by eq. (87) as a source in table conditions.

In the SBL, the total dispersion is calculated as follows.

6 The AMS/EPA Regulatory Model AERMOD

6.1 General Structure of AERMOD Including Terrain
6.2 AERMOD Concentration Predictions in the CBL
      6.2.1 DIRECT SOURCE CONTRIBUTION TO CONCENTRATION  
              CALCULATIONS IN THE CBL

      6.2.2 INDIRECT SOURCE CONTRIBUTION TO CONCENTRATION  
              CALCULATIONS IN THE CBL

      6.2.3 PENETRATED SOURCE CONTRIBUTION TO CONCENTRATION 
              CALCULATIONS IN THE CBL

6.3 Concentrations in the SBL Calculated by AERMOD 
6.4
Estimation of Dispersion Coefficients 
      6.4.1 AMBIENT TURBULENCE FOR USE IN CALCULATING DISPERSION
      6.4.2 BUOYANCY INDUCED DISPERSION (BID) COMPONENT OF _ AND _
              y z

      6.4.3 COMPONENT OF DISPERSION COEFFICIENTS DUE TO 
              DOWNWASH

6.5 Plume Rise Calculations in AERMOD
      6.5.1 PLUME RISE IN THE CBL 
      6.5.2 PLUME RISE IN THE SBL
6.6 Source Characterization 
6.7 Adjustments for the Urban Boundary Layer

< Back | Table of Contents | Forward >

 

Free Terrain Data

Free Met Data

AERMOD
CALPUFF
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
   

 

 

 


Home
| Products | Demos | Support | Courses | Contact Us
Digital Terrain Data | Links to Agencies | Air Toxics Index | FREE US EPA Models

Copyright © 1995-2008 Lakes Environmental Software
Send your comments to: webmaster@weblakes.com